Author summary
45%4 analyzed articles/videos566 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hoai-Tran Bui results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,598 hits. Analysis detected 11,768 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,996 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,628 of 6,360 authors). This Hoai-Tran Bui is better (less manipulative) than 72.80% of the peer group.
Hoai-Tran Bui
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
28%Hoai-Tran Bui (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,996
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510027.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.3%4.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.4%11.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate