Inverse55%

The Naruto Movie Will Stay "Very Close" To The Original, Director Destin Daniel Cretton Promises 66%

By Hoai-Tran Bui46%

7/22/2026, 8:30:25 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 753 faulty-reasoning hits from 566 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of 66% (7,501 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 65.70% of the article peer group.

Warner Bros/Kobal/Shutterstock Is a good live-action remake of an anime possible? 
On the Hollywood side of things, the track record is pretty spotty. 
For every Speed Racer (which, to be fair, was also derided in its time), there’s Dragonball Evolution . 
Or Ghost in the Shell . 
Okay, it’s a pretty bad track record, at least compared to the slate of pretty good anime adaptations that the Japanese film industry has to its name ( Battle Royale, Alice in Borderland , Rurouni Kenshin, and Blade of the Immortal , to name a few). 
So whenever Hollywood has its eyes on a big-name anime, it’s always cause for concern. 
But perhaps director Destin Daniel Cretton can turn that reputation around. 
It was recently reported that Cretton has been tapped to direct a live-action remake of Naruto , the popular ninja anime that ran for nearly two decades (and has an ongoing spinoff that’s still thriving). 
It’s a lot of pressure on any director, especially one who joins the project after it had been in development hell for nearly a decade . 
In a conversation with Inverse , Cretton spoke carefully about bringing Naruto to Hollywood. 
“I'm a big fan of it and a big fan of [series creator Masashi] Kishimoto-san,” Cretton tells Inverse. 
 I'll say that we are staying very close to what Kishimoto-san created. 
I think the biggest mistake we could do is bite off too much for one movie. 
I think what we're making right now is very exciting.” 
Naruto used Rasengan! 
| Studio Pierrot A loyal adaptation of the source material is all an anime fan can ask for. 
However, fidelity is just one piece of the puzzle  there also has to be an understanding of the heightened tone and stylized action that is unique to anime and manga. 
But Cretton, who managed to fuse Eastern and Western sensibilities pretty seamlessly in Marvel’s Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings and will next bring a “grounded” approach to Spider-Man in the upcoming Brand New Day , actually seems like a sensible choice. 
Shang-Chi managed to pay tonal and stylistic homage to Hong Kong action flicks, while doing its due diligence as a Marvel superhero film. 
So perhaps it’s Cretton who will be the rare Hollywood director to really get what it takes to make a Naruto movie. 
It’s part coming-of-age comedy and part epic tragedy, spanning decades in the lives of its main characters. 
And that tonal disparity is most present in its protagonist, Naruto, who gives the impression of being an airheaded goofball, but is also an orphan who’s ostracized by his entire village because he’s the vessel for a vengeful fox demon that once destroyed half the town. 
And that’s just the beginning of the very complicated and dense saga of Naruto . 
If Cretton plans to not “bite off too much for one movie,” it sounds like his movie could just encompass the first few story arcs in Naruto , which will follow the more lighthearted coming-of-age shenanigans of the class of ninjas-in-training, and end in some pretty devastating familial tragedies and betrayals. 
And if it’s successful, Cretton could easily turn Naruto into a long and epic series. 
Spider-Man: Brand New Day opens in theaters July 31. 
Naruto has not yet started production. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.3%Hoai-Tran Bui: 3.2%Inverse: 4.0%Confirmation Bias2.3%This article: 9.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.7%Inverse: 0.8%Anchoring Bias9.0%This article: 4.2%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.8%Inverse: 3.6%Availability Heuristic4.2%This article: 3.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.5%Inverse: 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic3.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.0%Inverse: 2.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 4.8%Inverse: 2.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 7.0%Inverse: 4.7%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.1%Inverse: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.4%Inverse: 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.2%Hoai-Tran Bui: 2.1%Inverse: 3.8%Optimism Bias10.2%This article: 2.7%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.4%Inverse: 2.1%Pessimism Bias2.7%This article: 21.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 8.5%Inverse: 8.7%Negativity Bias21.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.4%Inverse: 0.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.6%Inverse: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.1%Inverse: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.5%Inverse: 0.8%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.7%Inverse: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 7.4%Inverse: 5.4%Halo Effect11.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.1%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.9%Inverse: 1.9%Recency Bias4.1%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.1%Inverse: 0.8%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.2%Inverse: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.9%Hoai-Tran Bui: 4.3%Inverse: 2.7%Appeal to Authority12.9%This article: 5.5%Hoai-Tran Bui: 2.0%Inverse: 2.1%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.2%Inverse: 0.5%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%Hoai-Tran Bui: 4.4%Inverse: 8.0%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 1.2%Inverse: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 3.9%Hoai-Tran Bui: 4.3%Inverse: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion3.9%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.4%Inverse: 1.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.1%Hoai-Tran Bui: 3.0%Inverse: 3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.1%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.2%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 0.5%Burden of Proof7.2%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.1%Inverse: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 0.6%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 1.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.1%Hoai-Tran Bui: 2.5%Inverse: 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.2%Inverse: 0.3%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.2%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.7%Inverse: 1.6%Unattributed Quote6.2%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.2%Inverse: 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 11.4%Inverse: 21.3%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.3%Inverse: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.7%Inverse: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 0.0%Inverse: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Hoai-Tran Bui: 2.1%Inverse: 2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

566 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers13%attributed speech491writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageDestin Daniel Cretton • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDestin Daniel Cretton • 13 words • 0.0% coverageDestin Daniel Cretton • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDestin Daniel Cretton • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageStudio Pierrot • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Destin Daniel Cretton

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words76% of attributed speech79% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Unattributed Quote-7.1 ptsWriter: 7.1%Destin Daniel Cretton: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.