Speaker summary
⁠54%3 analyzed articles/videos175.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Destin Daniel Cretton results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 72.886 hits. Analysis detected 304.053 faulty-reasoning hits from 175.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,595 of 28,364 speakers). This Destin Daniel Cretton is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group.
Destin Daniel Cretton
Speaker details
Total words: 175.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510027.4% percentile
17.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos175.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.6%35.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 23.5%23.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 16.6%16.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.8%6.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 23.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.3%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos