Author summary
68% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lewis Parker results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 1,291 hits . Analysis detected 8,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,747 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 67% (2,098 of 6,244 authors). This Lewis Parker is worse (more manipulative) than 66.40% of the peer group. Lewis Parker
Author details
Total words: 6,747
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 7.9% 7.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 12.1% 12.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 12.4% 12.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 19.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 12.4%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Author 12.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 7.9%, sitewide 0.5% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.2%, sitewide 0.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst