Kotaku73%

A24 Reportedly Copyright-Striking Backrooms Indie Games And Artwork 86%

By Lewis Parker63%

7/16/2026, 5:30:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Negativity Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 33.1% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 474 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 77.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (3,155 of 21,165 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the article peer group.

It’s not been a great few weeks for A24’s PR team, and it’s about to get a whole lot worse if reports that the film production studio is copyright-striking Backrooms-related content are indeed true. 
According to several different sources, “A24 Films LLC” has supposedly been issuing bogus copyright claims against indie game developers and artists for producing Backrooms-themed content—even though the IP itself technically belongs to no one. 
In a post on the r/backrooms subreddit by user GnarlyNet, the artist claims that A24 hit them with a copyright strike on Redbubble, a print-on-demand marketplace for user-created artwork. 
GnarlyNet states that “A24 Films LLC” issued a copyright claim against their Backrooms-wallpaper-inspired artwork, which they explained was based on the “original 2019 Backrooms image” and “not copied from A24’s film or merchandise.” 
GnarlyNet isn’t the only artist reportedly getting hit with copyright claims, either, as another user on the subreddit shared more examples of Backrooms-inspired artwork that had been removed from Redbubble. 
That’s not the most egregious example, though, as a developer from indie team Davilkus Games also stated that they were hit with three copyright strikes earlier this month, which resulted in the team’s Google Play developer account getting banned. 
Welp, this is it, A24 is now trying to copyright the backrooms. 
They’re taking down wallpaper designs from redbubble that were made ages before the film came out. pic.twitter.com/QBANiEI9P3 
 assorted goods & sundries (@maywrence) July 15, 2026 
In a separate post, Davilkus Games explained that its game, originally titled Exit the Backrooms: Level 94, had to be renamed to Liminal Complex: Level 94 as it was violating Google’s “impersonation policy.” 
Worse still, according to Davilkus Games, at least “3 other small indie devs” were hit with similar copyright claims on the Google Play store. 
“Back on July 3rd, I woke up to a bunch of emails from Google Play. 
Some of our Backrooms games were permanently taken down out of nowhere,” stated the developer. 
“It wasn’t just us  it was a silent ban wave. 
I know at least 3 other small indie devs who had their games suspended that exact same morning. 
Bigger studios with Backrooms games seemed to be unaffected.” 
Kane Parsons, the director of A24’s Backrooms film, stated in a comment on the initial Reddit thread that he is “looking into this” and that it “should not be happening.” 
While content related to A24’s Backrooms, such as images and videos from the film itself, do indeed belong to A24, the concept of the Backrooms was originally shared in a 4chan thread in 2019, and featured an image from an independent photographer taken in 2002. 
Kotaku has reached out to A24 for comment to confirm if the production studio is behind the recent Backrooms-related copyright claims, but did not receive a reply before publishing. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.5%Lewis Parker: 3.3%Kotaku: 4.0%Confirmation Bias9.5%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.8%Kotaku: 1.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 33.1%Lewis Parker: 5.4%Kotaku: 3.9%Availability Heuristic33.1%This article: 9.5%Lewis Parker: 1.2%Kotaku: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic9.5%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 16.0%Lewis Parker: 5.5%Kotaku: 5.8%Framing Effect16.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.1%Kotaku: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Lewis Parker: 0.3%Kotaku: 1.1%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.2%Kotaku: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 3.4%Kotaku: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 10.3%Lewis Parker: 2.5%Kotaku: 3.4%Pessimism Bias10.3%This article: 28.5%Lewis Parker: 20.9%Kotaku: 13.6%Negativity Bias28.5%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.5%Kotaku: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Lewis Parker: 1.1%Kotaku: 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error7.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.7%Kotaku: 1.3%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%Lewis Parker: 0.1%Kotaku: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.4%Kotaku: 3.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.5%Kotaku: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Lewis Parker: 3.2%Kotaku: 2.4%Recency Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.3%Kotaku: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.2%Kotaku: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 6.3%Lewis Parker: 4.0%Kotaku: 2.6%Appeal to Authority6.3%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.4%Kotaku: 2.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.5%Lewis Parker: 1.8%Kotaku: 0.9%Slippery Slope2.5%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.6%Lewis Parker: 11.0%Kotaku: 9.1%Hasty Generalization19.6%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.7%Kotaku: 1.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 9.4%Kotaku: 5.9%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 7.2%Lewis Parker: 1.1%Kotaku: 0.8%Begging the Question7.2%This article: 12.9%Lewis Parker: 1.7%Kotaku: 2.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.9%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.3%Lewis Parker: 2.3%Kotaku: 0.7%Burden of Proof13.3%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.5%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 30.0%Lewis Parker: 10.1%Kotaku: 4.3%Anecdotal30.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 16.7%Lewis Parker: 3.2%Kotaku: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)16.7%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 1.4%Kotaku: 0.5%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.3%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.2%Special Pleading6.3%This article: 7.0%Lewis Parker: 0.4%Kotaku: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy7.0%This article: 28.7%Lewis Parker: 4.1%Kotaku: 2.7%Unattributed Quote28.7%This article: 10.1%Lewis Parker: 3.7%Kotaku: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection10.1%This article: 19.6%Lewis Parker: 12.9%Kotaku: 15.2%Biased Writer Voice19.6%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.9%Kotaku: 2.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 0.0%Kotaku: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lewis Parker: 6.9%Kotaku: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

474 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers35%attributed speech310writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageGnarlyNet • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDaviklus Games • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageDaviklus Games • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDavilkus Games • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDavilkus Games • 11 words • 100.0% coverageDavilkus Games • 18 words • 0.0% coverageDavilkus Games • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKane Parsons • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Davilkus Games

100%flagged-word coverage
53 attributed words32% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%15.0%30.0%Biased Writer Voice-30.0 ptsWriter: 30.0%Davilkus Games: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-28.4 ptsWriter: 28.4%Davilkus Games: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+8.8 ptsWriter: 11.9%Davilkus Games: 20.8%20.8%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.