Keyword summary
16% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,568 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Adaptation results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,519 hits . Analysis detected 12,406 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,171 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (35,531 of 36,701 keywords). This Adaptation is better (less manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. Adaptation
Keyword details
Total words: 23,171
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.2% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst