Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Fechi Inyama results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Pessimism Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 378 hits . Analysis detected 3,180 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,347 authors). This Fechi Inyama is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Fechi Inyama
Author details
Total words: 4,140
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst