Publication summary
28% 45 analyzed articles/videos 20,238 analyzed words
BS Summary: These PhillyVoice results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 6,144 hits . Analysis detected 65,064 faulty-reasoning hits from 96,960 analyzed words across 45 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 16% (321 of 379 publications). This PhillyVoice is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 96,960
Article count: 45
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score45 analyzed articles97K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst