Author summary
⁠45%5 analyzed articles/videos2,390 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly McVety results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 1,277 hits. Analysis detected 8,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,463 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (3,879 of 6,192 authors). This Molly McVety is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.
Molly McVety
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠38%Molly McVety (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,463
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

37% percentile
025507510037.4% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 13.5%13.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.4%3.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos