Philly DA Larry Krasner subpoenaed by House Judiciary Committee over request for immigration records 70%

By Molly McVety46%

7/16/2026, 2:25:56 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, False Dilemma, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.9% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 1,032 faulty-reasoning hits from 404 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.6% and a BS Rank of 70% (6,724 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the article peer group.

The House Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena to Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner on Wednesday, claiming his office has not delivered documents related to its treatment of immigrants. 
In a letter to Krasner, Chairman Jim Jordan, a Republican from Ohio, said committee members sought materials on May 4 related to the DA Office's "preferential treatment" of immigrants without permanent legal status, but that city prosecutors "have failed to produce even a single responsive document." 
The subpoena requires Krasner to produce the requested material by July 29. 
MORE: Mayor Parker vows to fight to restore President's House exhibit after Trump administration replaces slavery panels 
The Republican-led committee, which acts as the lawyer for the House of Representatives, accused Krasner of "failing to prosecute" or "under-prosecuting" immigrants so that they can avoid immigration consequences. 
The committee said this undermines the authority of Congress. 
The DA's Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 
But in a video posted to social media, Krasner called the letter he received from Jordan on May 4 a 'nasty-gram.' 
The video shows a line from the letter that claims "illegal alien criminals are allowed to freely operate, terrorize local communities, and reoffend without consequences" under his jurisdiction. 
"Where's my public hearing?" 
Krasner asks in the video, referencing a request he previously had made of the committee. 
"He would rather accuse from a distance and then do dirt in the dark than do anything in public." 
In his latest letter to Krasner, Jordan said the committee received two responses from Krasner's office. 
The first, sent May 18, asserted that the Judiciary Committee cannot control how local prosecutors pursue immigration policy and requested time to retain counsel to address the demands. 
The second, dated July 7, made "bizarre and baseless demands" before agreeing to cooperate with committee members, the letter said. 
"Rather than provide responsive materials or legal justification for his refusal to cooperate with the Committee, Krasner has only made bizarre and baseless demands and conditions on his cooperation with the Committee's oversight," the committee said in a statement. 
On May 13, Krasner said he would answer the initial request "soon" and requested a "very public hearing." 
He also asked that the committee and Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials provide information on "all criminal prosecutions locally and nationally" that have posed a threat to public safety. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 18.8%Molly McVety: 3.4%PhillyVoice: 2.7%Confirmation Bias18.8%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.0%PhillyVoice: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 2.5%PhillyVoice: 3.0%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.2%PhillyVoice: 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 2.3%PhillyVoice: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.3%Molly McVety: 13.5%PhillyVoice: 4.3%Framing Effect18.3%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.8%PhillyVoice: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.9%Molly McVety: 0.5%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Status Quo Bias6.9%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.5%Molly McVety: 1.9%PhillyVoice: 4.7%Optimism Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.2%PhillyVoice: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.9%Molly McVety: 8.5%PhillyVoice: 6.6%Negativity Bias30.9%This article: 5.2%Molly McVety: 1.5%PhillyVoice: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.2%PhillyVoice: 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.8%PhillyVoice: 0.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Molly McVety: 0.6%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 2.1%PhillyVoice: 3.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.0%PhillyVoice: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Molly McVety: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Molly McVety: 1.2%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Ad Hominem9.9%This article: 7.2%Molly McVety: 0.7%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Straw Man7.2%This article: 9.2%Molly McVety: 5.7%PhillyVoice: 3.0%Appeal to Authority9.2%This article: 21.5%Molly McVety: 1.6%PhillyVoice: 1.1%False Dilemma21.5%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.6%Molly McVety: 5.8%PhillyVoice: 3.8%Hasty Generalization14.6%This article: 4.2%Molly McVety: 0.7%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Red Herring4.2%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 21.3%Molly McVety: 8.7%PhillyVoice: 3.5%Appeal to Emotion21.3%This article: 23.3%Molly McVety: 2.2%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Begging the Question23.3%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 1.7%PhillyVoice: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 18.6%Molly McVety: 1.0%PhillyVoice: 0.4%Burden of Proof18.6%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.2%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.3%PhillyVoice: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.9%Molly McVety: 2.6%PhillyVoice: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.9%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 5.0%Molly McVety: 0.4%PhillyVoice: 0.1%Special Pleading5.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 2.0%PhillyVoice: 1.0%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 6.9%Molly McVety: 1.6%PhillyVoice: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection6.9%This article: 11.4%Molly McVety: 1.5%PhillyVoice: 4.3%Biased Writer Voice11.4%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 4.7%PhillyVoice: 1.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.0%PhillyVoice: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.4%PhillyVoice: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Molly McVety: 0.6%PhillyVoice: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

404 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers79%attributed speech83writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJim Jordan • 46 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 21 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 28 words • 100.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 4 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJim Jordan • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJim Jordan • 28 words • 0.0% coverageJim Jordan • 20 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 39 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
77 attributed words24% of attributed speech54% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.