Keyword summary
59% 71 analyzed articles/videos 31,798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 10,291 hits . Analysis detected 117,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 177,124 analyzed words across 71 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (34,667 of 35,718 keywords). This Philadelphia is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Philadelphia
Keyword details
Total words: 177,124
Article count: 71
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score71 analyzed articles177.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst