Speaker summary
69% 6 analyzed articles/videos 274.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These House Judiciary Committee results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Begging the Question , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 149 hits . Analysis detected 1,490.801 faulty-reasoning hits from 274.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (21,106 of 28,364 speakers). This House Judiciary Committee is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group. House Judiciary Committee
Speaker details
Total words: 274.333
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.6% percentile 16.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos274.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 37.4% 37.4% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 18.9% 18.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 17.3% 17.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 15.4% 15.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 39.0% 39.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 12.4% 12.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 27.3% 27.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 10.1% 10.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 26.9% Begging the Question: Speaker 37.4%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.3%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.5% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 7.5% Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 11.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 0.4% Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 10.1%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst