House Judiciary Committee issues subpoena to Philly DA Larry Krasner, demands immigration records 37%

By Jeff Gammage49%

7/15/2026, 2:46:42 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 1,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 745 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.6% and a BS Rank of 37% (13,846 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.30% of the article peer group.

The House Judiciary Committee subpoenaed Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner on Wednesday, ordering him to turn over documents related to his office’s handling of immigration matters and criticizing what it called the prosecutor’s “pro-illegal-alien policies.” 
The Republican-led Congressional committee said in a letter that it sent the subpoena after Krasner, a Democrat, promised but failed to provide materials that were requested in May. 
The committee, in a letter signed by Rep. 
Jim Jordan (R., Ohio), its chair, accused Krasner of declining to prosecute or under-prosecuting foreign nationals so that they could avoid consequences connected to their immigration status. 
The committee said it was asserting its authority to try to end sanctuary-city policies in cities including Philadelphia. 
In response, Krasner called the subpoena “yet another step in authoritarian efforts to do dirt in the dark” and to put pressure on state prosecutors. 
“We have always complied with the law and will continue to do that,” Krasner said Wednesday. 
“That makes us different from [President Donald] Trump, who spends all day, every day, violating the law of the U.S. 
Constitution  and morality.“ 
Krasner and the House committee have sparred since May, when the panel accused top city law enforcement officials of shielding criminal immigrants through sanctuary policies and demanded that they quickly turn over a trove of related records and correspondence. 
That represented an escalation by Trump-allied Republicans in their criticism of Philadelphia government on rules concerning undocumented residents, particularly around limiting city cooperation with U.S. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement. 
In April, City Council approved high-profile “ICE Out” legislation aimed at restricting immigration enforcement in Philadelphia, putting the city at the forefront of local resistance to Trump’s deportation campaign. 
The Trump administration challenged part of that package of bills, and this month a federal judge ruled that the city could not prevent ICE agents from concealing their identities. 
In May, in letters to Krasner, Police Commissioner Kevin Bethel, and Sheriff Rochelle Bilal, the Judiciary Committee accused each of hindering federal immigration enforcement. 
Each letter sought up to six years of immigration communications between their agencies and immigration officials and, in the sheriff’s case, with activist groups including No ICE Philly, Juntos, Asian Americans United, and others. 
The Trump administration has clashed with cities and states that embrace sanctuary policies, contending they are hurting Americans and threatening to cut their federal funding. 
Philadelphia has long been among the targets. 
Krasner had responded by telling the committee, which said it was conducting oversight of state and local jurisdictions that it believes endanger Americans by not assisting immigration agents, that such policing powers belong to the city. 
“The legal errors are unsurprising,” Krasner wrote to Jordan and to Rep. 
Tom McClintock (R., Calif.), chair of the subcommittee on immigration, noting that neither had passed the bar. 
“The factual errors are also unsurprising, given your histories of adhering to wholly repudiated, counterfactual and unscientific election denialism, climate change denialism, and the like.” 
Krasner wrote that he needed time to address each of the committee’s allegations and requests, and was working to hire a lawyer who would be in touch soon. 
In July, Krasner wrote the committee and encouraged it to “question me in public so all Americans are able to see who is telling the truth.” 
The committee’s “fear of such a public airing only makes clearer your lack of real purpose and your complicity in peddling lies,” such as, he said, that local and state prosecutors “rather than President Trump’s ill-conceived deportation actions are responsible for criminals going free.” 
Immigrants are far less likely to commit and be arrested for crimes than U.S. citizens, Krasner noted. 
But the small number of immigrants who commit serious crimes are being deported by ICE before they can stand trial and be sentenced, given “a ‘get out of jail free’ card and a plane ride to another country, a country where they will never face American justice.” 
The committee told Krasner on Wednesday that time to provide the requested records had run out. 
Its subpoena directs him to turn over the materials by July 29. 
“Although you may disagree about the need to reform federal law to end sanctuary policies  you cannot seriously contend that the committee lacks the authority to do so,” the committee wrote, adding that Congress may amend statutes “to ensure that prosecutors cannot circumvent immigration law and allow aliens to escape accountability for their crimes.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Jeff Gammage: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.9%Jeff Gammage: 0.2%Inquirer.com: 2.5%Availability Heuristic0.9%This article: 2.3%Jeff Gammage: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Jeff Gammage: 9.9%Inquirer.com: 5.0%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 7.4%Jeff Gammage: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Loss Aversion7.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 2.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.3%Jeff Gammage: 1.6%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Pessimism Bias6.3%This article: 14.8%Jeff Gammage: 4.9%Inquirer.com: 5.7%Negativity Bias14.8%This article: 8.1%Jeff Gammage: 2.6%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias8.1%This article: 2.3%Jeff Gammage: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error2.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Jeff Gammage: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 1.2%In-Group Bias2.7%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 17.9%Jeff Gammage: 14.1%Inquirer.com: 0.6%Ad Hominem17.9%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 1.5%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.3%Jeff Gammage: 0.6%Inquirer.com: 2.3%Appeal to Authority2.3%This article: 13.3%Jeff Gammage: 3.3%Inquirer.com: 1.1%False Dilemma13.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Jeff Gammage: 4.6%Inquirer.com: 3.3%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 3.4%Jeff Gammage: 1.7%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Red Herring3.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 17.0%Jeff Gammage: 14.9%Inquirer.com: 3.1%Appeal to Emotion17.0%This article: 13.3%Jeff Gammage: 5.2%Inquirer.com: 0.7%Begging the Question13.3%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.7%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 12.2%Jeff Gammage: 3.1%Inquirer.com: 0.3%Burden of Proof12.2%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.4%Jeff Gammage: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 1.3%Unattributed Quote7.4%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.9%Inquirer.com: 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 4.7%Jeff Gammage: 2.3%Inquirer.com: 4.4%Biased Writer Voice4.7%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 7.2%Jeff Gammage: 1.8%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias7.2%This article: 7.1%Jeff Gammage: 4.8%Inquirer.com: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Jeff Gammage: 0.0%Inquirer.com: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

745 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers63%attributed speech276writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageJim Jordan • 27 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 18 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 16 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 20 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 36 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 12 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 25 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 28 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 26 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 44 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 17 words • 0.0% coverageLarry Krasner • 47 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 12 words • 0.0% coverageHouse Judiciary Committee • 55 words • 100.0% coverage
44%flagged-word coverage
125 attributed words27% of attributed speech54% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+44.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%House Judiciary Committee: 44.0%44.0%Politically Left Leaning B-19.6 ptsWriter: 19.6%House Judiciary Committee: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -19.2 ptsWriter: 19.2%House Judiciary Committee: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.7 ptsWriter: 12.7%House Judiciary Committee: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.