Keyword summary
47% 1 analyzed article/video 745 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Krasner House Jordan Immigration Sanctuary Philly results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Framing Effect , and Begging the Question , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 444 hits . Analysis detected 2,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,980 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,609 of 37,536 keywords). This Krasner House Jordan Immigration Sanctuary Philly is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Krasner House Jordan Immigration Sanctuary Philly
Keyword details
Total words: 2,980
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Red Herring: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.7% Straw Man: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst