Topic summary
69% 9 analyzed articles/videos 2,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sanctuary Cities results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 2,326 hits . Analysis detected 22,567 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,104 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (9,809 of 15,597 topics). This Sanctuary Cities is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group. Sanctuary Cities
Topic details
Total words: 18,104
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 37.1% percentile 2.4% BS Score9 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.4% 9.4% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst