Author summary
0% 18 analyzed articles/videos 7,804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Sommerlad results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 8,763 hits . Analysis detected 59,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,892 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (3,060 of 6,359 authors). This Joe Sommerlad is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group. Joe Sommerlad
Author details
Total words: 42,892
Article count: 18
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score18 analyzed articles42.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 11.7% 11.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.9% Ad Hominem: Author 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst