‘The Trump effect’: President ridiculed in US after team thrashed by Belgium at World Cup 73%

By Joe Sommerlad0%

7/7/2026, 11:12:06 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 54.2% saturation with 252 hits. Analysis detected 1,586 faulty-reasoning hits from 465 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of 73% (5,892 of 21,182 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has been ridiculed after his controversial intervention in the FIFA World Cup proved fruitless and the U.S. crashed out of the tournament in a comprehensive 4-1 thrashing by Belgium. 
Trump had lobbied FIFA President Gianni Infantino for Balogun to be allowed to play and said of Belgium: “If they beat us, they can be really proud. 
The other way, if they beat us, we’ll say  I’ll say it was rigged, just like the election was rigged in 2020, but I won’t get into that.” 
In the end, the Europeans ran out worthy winners in Seattle, knocking out a curiously lacklustre U.S. and prompting California Democratic Sen. 
Alex Padilla to brand the whole affair the latest example of “the Trump effect” in action. 
Padilla posted a short clip of himself on X carrying the scoreline and saying of Trump: “He’s like the reverse Midas touch  everything he touches turns to… you know what.” 
The Belgian players certainly enjoyed their victory, appearing to mock the president’s signature dance at full time while their official Instagram account posted a picture of forward Romelu Lukaku celebrating with the caption: “Overturn this.” 
The Republicans Against Trump account on X had already joked about the president imposing 6,000 percent tariffs on Belgian exports as revenge for the result and followed it up with a clip of dance alongside the caption: “Make it 12,000 percent.” 
Trump was also derided by podcaster Spencer Hakiman, who said the scandal “just shows you that everything he touches is delegitimate crap,” warning that anything coach Mauricio Pochettino’s team achieved at the World Cup would now be “questioned.” 
Geopolitics expert Cyrus Janssen had similarly called it a “lose-lose situation” for the host nation, explaining: “We beat Belgium and the victory will be tainted as we needed our President to cheat to help us win. 
“If we lose than [sic] even our President cheating couldn’t help us win.” 
Other politicians reacting to Monday’s disappointment tried to place the emphasis on the U.S. team’s efforts on the pitch, with California Gov. 
Gavin Newsom writing on X: “Thank you USMNT for the thrills, the joy, and the belief these last few weeks. 
“It was an honor to host you in California  see you on the field in 2030!! 
Forever and always, go #TeamUSA!” 
New York Gov. 
Kathy Hochul wrote: “The USMNT left it all on the field tonight and showed the world what we’re made of. 
I couldn’t be more proud.” 
“We must have watched different games,” came one withering response. 
Trump himself, en route to a Nato summit in Turkey, has yet to comment on his unpopular intervention backfiring, despite spending another busy evening posting on Truth Social. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.4%Joe Sommerlad: 4.9%The Independent: 3.9%Confirmation Bias14.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.3%The Independent: 1.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.4%Joe Sommerlad: 3.7%The Independent: 3.4%Availability Heuristic14.4%This article: 4.7%Joe Sommerlad: 1.1%The Independent: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic4.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.8%The Independent: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.6%The Independent: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Joe Sommerlad: 9.5%The Independent: 8.1%Framing Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.3%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 2.1%Optimism Bias12.3%This article: 10.5%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 1.1%Pessimism Bias10.5%This article: 54.2%Joe Sommerlad: 20.4%The Independent: 9.9%Negativity Bias54.2%This article: 4.3%Joe Sommerlad: 3.2%The Independent: 2.1%Self-Serving Bias4.3%This article: 7.5%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error7.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.9%Joe Sommerlad: 4.8%The Independent: 1.3%In-Group Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.2%The Independent: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 1.1%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 2.5%Halo Effect1.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.4%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 1.8%Recency Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.6%The Independent: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Joe Sommerlad: 6.8%The Independent: 1.7%Ad Hominem19.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.0%The Independent: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 4.2%The Independent: 3.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.5%Joe Sommerlad: 2.7%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma10.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.5%The Independent: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 21.7%Joe Sommerlad: 8.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization21.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.9%The Independent: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.1%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 0.7%Bandwagon1.1%This article: 16.3%Joe Sommerlad: 8.1%The Independent: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion16.3%This article: 14.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.5%The Independent: 1.1%Begging the Question14.0%This article: 19.6%Joe Sommerlad: 5.2%The Independent: 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 8.2%Joe Sommerlad: 1.0%The Independent: 1.0%Burden of Proof8.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 15.1%Joe Sommerlad: 4.4%The Independent: 1.9%Anecdotal15.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.7%Joe Sommerlad: 2.0%The Independent: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.7%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 20.2%Joe Sommerlad: 2.8%The Independent: 2.4%Unattributed Quote20.2%This article: 3.2%Joe Sommerlad: 2.9%The Independent: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection3.2%This article: 36.3%Joe Sommerlad: 11.7%The Independent: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice36.3%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.1%The Independent: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 3.4%The Independent: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 2.6%The Independent: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

465 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers58%attributed speech194writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAlex Padilla • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageRepublicans Against Trump • 41 words • 100.0% coverageSpencer Hakiman • 38 words • 100.0% coverageCyrus Janssen • 36 words • 0.0% coverageCyrus Janssen • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 20 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 17 words • 0.0% coverageGavin Newsom • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Spencer Hakiman

100%flagged-word coverage
38 attributed words14% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+79.4 ptsWriter: 20.6%Spencer Hakiman: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-50.0 ptsWriter: 50.0%Spencer Hakiman: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-7.7 ptsWriter: 7.7%Spencer Hakiman: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.