Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Folarin Balogun results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 3,666 hits . Analysis detected 24,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,703 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (9,539 of 16,562 topics). This Folarin Balogun is better (less manipulative) than 57.60% of the peer group. Folarin Balogun
Topic details
Total words: 19,703
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles19.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst