Trump posts bizarre painting of himself with George Washington and a robot 51%

By Joe Sommerlad0%

6/29/2026, 1:56:28 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Representativeness Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.7% saturation with 148 hits. Analysis detected 914 faulty-reasoning hits from 403 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50.7% and a BS Rank of 51% (10,768 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 50.80% of the article peer group.

President Donald Trump has posted a painting on Truth Social that brings together classic all-American imagery - with an unusual twist. 
The artwork shows George Washington and Trump either side of a collage of patriotic scenes, from the signing of the Declaration of Independence to the Moon landing. 
Other iconic imagery includes a pioneer’s wagon, the Statue of Liberty and Mount Rushmore. 
But less traditionally, in the center of the piece, a man who appears to be Washington and a boy sit down to watch a firework display in the company of a humanoid robot. 
The identity of the artist responsible was not given by the president, but his caption on the post read: “Great painting!! 
President DJT”. 
On X, a fan account entitled MAGA Voice hailed the work as “EPIC” and added: “Liberals can’t stand all of this winning.” 
Many commentators relished the idea that the painting might upset Democrats while several suggested it should be hung in the Oval Office immediately. 
Less positive responses likened it to North Korean propaganda, while another edited the picture to replace the current president with John F Kennedy. 
The painting was not the only eyebrow-raising artwork to appear on Trump’s page over the weekend. 
He also posted an AI image of himself as Atlas holding up the Earth and a picture of a grinning Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris wearing red MAGA-style caps with the slogan: “I Lost to Trump.” 
The president has long enjoyed fan art and regularly recirculates flattering tributes on his platform, causing an uproar earlier this year when he posted an AI meme of himself as Jesus Christ healing a sick man. 
Earlier this year, he posted another picture of himself conducting a symphony orchestra  complete with members of his cabinet and the late Charlie Kirk taking up the instruments  by the Utah artist Jon McNaughton, who became a social media phenomenon during his first term. 
McNaughton is known for his eccentric, America First spins on U.S. iconography, casting Trump as Washington crossing a stagnant swamp, in place of the Delaware river, in one typical example. 
The president’s latest offering comes amid the country’s 250th anniversary celebrations, which has already seen Trump host a UFC fight on the White House Lawn and open a “Great American State Fair” on the National Mall in Washington, D.C. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 4.9%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.3%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Joe Sommerlad: 3.7%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 15.6%Joe Sommerlad: 1.1%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic15.6%This article: 8.9%Joe Sommerlad: 0.8%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.6%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Joe Sommerlad: 9.5%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 26.1%Joe Sommerlad: 20.4%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias26.1%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 3.2%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error8.9%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Joe Sommerlad: 4.8%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.2%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.4%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 13.6%Joe Sommerlad: 1.7%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias13.6%This article: 11.4%Joe Sommerlad: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect11.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 6.8%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 4.2%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 2.7%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.5%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.3%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.2%Joe Sommerlad: 8.3%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization13.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.9%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 11.2%Joe Sommerlad: 1.8%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon11.2%This article: 11.2%Joe Sommerlad: 8.1%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion11.2%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.5%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 18.6%Joe Sommerlad: 5.2%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)18.6%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.5%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 1.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.4%Joe Sommerlad: 4.4%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal11.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.0%Joe Sommerlad: 2.0%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.2%Joe Sommerlad: 2.8%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote5.2%This article: 0.5%Joe Sommerlad: 2.9%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.5%This article: 36.7%Joe Sommerlad: 11.7%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice36.7%This article: 9.4%Joe Sommerlad: 1.1%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination9.4%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 3.4%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.5%Joe Sommerlad: 2.6%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%Joe Sommerlad: 0.2%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

403 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers6.0%attributed speech379writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coveragePresident DJT • 2 words • 100.0% coverageMAGA Voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

MAGA Voice

100%flagged-word coverage
22 attributed words92% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%MAGA Voice: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-39.1 ptsWriter: 39.1%MAGA Voice: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%MAGA Voice: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%MAGA Voice: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.