Topic summary
86% 19 analyzed articles/videos 13,897 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maga results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 15,921 hits . Analysis detected 98,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,148 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,259 of 16,562 topics). This Maga is worse (more manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group. Maga
Topic details
Total words: 61,148
Article count: 18
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
50% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 50.1% percentile 3.0% BS Score18 analyzed articles61.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 26.0% 26.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst