Author summary
94% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,431 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Heather Digby Parton results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 36.2% saturation with 4,466 hits . Analysis detected 22,059 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,349 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,496 of 6,244 authors). This Heather Digby Parton is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Heather Digby Parton
Author details
Total words: 12,349
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 36.2% 36.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.8% 17.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 9.5% 9.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 14.8% 14.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 36.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.8%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 14.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 9.5%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Straw Man: Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst