Author summary
83% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Steven Greenhut results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 2,112 hits . Analysis detected 14,895 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,170 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (2,434 of 6,628 authors). This Steven Greenhut is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. Steven Greenhut
Author details
Total words: 9,170
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 23.0% 23.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.1% 16.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 23.0%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst