HuffPost0%
The Right’s Birthright Citizenship Freak-Out Shows What’s At The Heart Of MAGA 84%
By Paul Blumenthal0%
7/3/2026, 12:00:17 PM
BS Summary: This article contains 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.9% saturation with 302 hits. Analysis detected 2,641 faulty-reasoning hits from 721 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,588 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the article peer group.
You would think that Republican Party influencers would be elated that President Donald Trump’s Hail Mary executive order to rewrite the Constitution’s 14th Amendment citizenship clause led four justices on the Supreme Court to side with them, and conclude that the clause does not say what everyone has understood it to say since it was adopted.
Instead, they’re apoplectic.
Tuesday’s decision to uphold the 150-plus-year understanding that the 14th Amendment grants citizenship to all but a select few born on U.S. soil was cause for “Dissolution of the Union,” The Federalist’s Sean Davis wrote online.
Right-wing influencer Matt Walsh called it “Total madness.
Suicide.”
Adding, “Words cannot describe how evil this is.”
Others referred to it as turning citizenship into a “joke,” and a “tremendous betrayal.”
Trump himself said the decision was “too bad for our Country.”
This five-alarm freak-out comes even though nothing has changed.
The Supreme Court merely affirmed the status quo.
The country has not committed suicide since the 14th Amendment was adopted in 1868, nor has the ruling changed citizenship for any of those freaking out.
That is, unless you have a particular vision about what citizenship looks like — a vision like that of chief White House ideologist Stephen Miller.
“We have people from all over the world, from third-world nations, nations that on their own would have never invented the wheel, let alone modern technology, let alone medicine, let alone air travel,” Miller ranted after the court’s decision.
“And they can just come into the country, have a baby at a hospital paid for by you and me, and then that baby is automatically a citizen?
That baby can sit on a jury when he turns 18 and sit in judgment of you and sit in judgment of me and sit in judgment of our loved ones?
Can decide who our mayors are?
Our governors are?
Our presidents are?”
He concluded: “Citizenship means nothing if it is open to everyone.”
Citizenship, in this view, is not for everyone of every national origin or race.
The American national community must be restricted and expansions of that community rolled back.
Citizens have a color and it isn’t the color of those from “third-world nations,” as Miller puts it.
This is the beating heart of Trumpism and the MAGA movement.
From birtherism to birthright citizenship, Trump has made the issue of who is or isn’t American the central focus of his political efforts.
He has described this mission to redraw the lines of the American national community in existential terms.
But Trump’s effort faced steep hurdles from the beginning.
It harkened back to a time before the country truly accepted all, no matter their race, sex, religion or creed, as equal members of the national community ― and the right’s fevered reaction to the decision shows their rage at how difficult it may be for them to turn back time.
That expansion of who counts as American began with the New Deal and accelerated after World War II.
This progressed through laws such as the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts, court decisions expanding women’s rights, and cultural efforts like platoon movies and increased diversity in film, television, and music.
For immigrants, this project culminated in the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, which undid decades of restrictive immigration laws that effectively prevented the entry of non-white immigrants into the country.
It is no secret that Trump and his allies would be thrilled to go back to a two-tier system of America, where some have rights, privileges, and membership, and others simply don’t.
They have never said the quiet part, well, quietly.
But rarely have they had the chance to attack the foundations of America so obviously and openly.
Trump’s attack on birthright citizenship then is not just a policy effort to limit citizenship for the children of certain non-citizens, but a symbolic strike on the ideological foundation that has propelled the country to make good on that 250-year-old proposition.
It is an effort to refute Lincoln and the Declaration in pursuit of a great whitening of the country.
This has happened before, when Reconstruction was deliberately unraveled, and Jim Crow placed in its stead.
But it does not have to happen again.
Speakers
4speakers26%attributed speech536writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageStephen Miller
121 attributed words65% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.