Author summary
68% 60 analyzed articles/videos 47,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie DeBenedetti results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 17,122 hits . Analysis detected 154,258 faulty-reasoning hits from 187,174 analyzed words across 59 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,222 of 6,137 authors). This Katie DeBenedetti is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Katie DeBenedetti
Author details
Total words: 187,174
Article count: 59
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score59 analyzed articles187.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.0% 9.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst