KQED61%

San Francisco CEO Gets 6 Years for Scheme to Sell Adderall Online 40%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

7/7/2026, 11:01:51 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 46.2% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 1,343 faulty-reasoning hits from 770 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of 40% (13,263 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 60.60% of the article peer group.

A San Francisco-based telehealth company’s top executives were sentenced to years in prison on Tuesday over a $100 million scheme to fraudulently distribute Adderall and other stimulants. 
Ruthia He, the founder and CEO of Done Global, and David Brody, its clinical president, were convicted of conspiring to commit healthcare fraud and distributing controlled substances to people without a medical need and conspiring to defraud pharmacies, along with Medicaid, Medicare and commercial insurers, to dispense stimulants in violation of their corresponding responsibilities. 
He was handed down the six-year sentence, followed by three years of supervised release, though Judge Charles Breyer said she was likely to be deported after her release. 
He, who came to the U.S. from China 14 years ago, told the court tearfully that she had wanted to contribute and make a positive impact. 
Brody, 70, was given a shorter two-year sentence, followed by three years of supervised release. 
His lawyer, Roberto Escobar, said he planned to appeal. 
Prior to his sentencing, he said he was remorseful for his actions and asked to be sentenced to home confinement. 
His defense counsel said he had spent three decades providing mental-health care to underserved communities in San Francisco. 
“I was faced with a challenging situational operation, and I chose poorly,” he told Breyer. 
“I relied too heavily on my own judgment. 
At the very moment when outside input would have made a crucial difference, I failed to engage others. 
I also owe an apology to the patients and staff of Done.” 
Both will be fined $1 million, in addition to restitution to the families of victims. 
The pair spearheaded the online mental health treatment venture to provide easy access to Adderall, Vyvanse and other stimulants. 
The Department of Justice alleged that they took advantage of eased restrictions on prescribing controlled substances without in-person consultations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 
“The defendants allegedly preyed on Americans and put profits over patients by exploiting telemedicine rules that facilitated access to medications during the unprecedented COVID-19 public health emergency,” Anne Milgram, then-administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, said in a statement after their arrests. 
Since the beginning of the pandemic, the company arranged for the prescription of more than 40 million pills, according to court documents. 
“Instead of properly addressing medical needs, the defendants allegedly made millions of dollars by pushing addictive medications,” Milgram said. 
According to the company’s now-defunct website, Brody co-founded Done Global in 2019, calling it a “passion project” to help friends and coworkers in need of mental-health care navigate a complex system. 
The startup promoted a quick and easy process to become a monthly subscriber: members completed a one-minute assessment, followed by a telehealth appointment with a licensed clinician before paying the $79 monthly fee for “worry-free refills” and ongoing care. 
In 2022, major pharmacies stopped filling prescriptions from prescribers at Done, and another online mental health company, Cerebral  which also came under federal investigation  after reports that some healthcare professionals felt pressured into diagnoses. 
In 2024, Cerebral agreed to pay more than $3.6 million “for engaging in practices that encouraged the unauthorized distribution of controlled substances” as part of a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of New York. 
Done faced similar scrutiny, and according to court documents, paid medical professionals to diagnose members with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and write them prescriptions for Adderall and other stimulants, even when people did not qualify for the medications. 
He and Brody, among others at the company, created policies including limiting the information available to prescribers, instructing them to issue Adderall and other stimulants even if the Done member did not qualify, and limiting appointments to under 30 minutes. 
The Department of Justice alleged that they falsely represented their prescription policies, claiming that they were able to keep appointments short with a screening process designed to weed out people who were unlikely to qualify for a diagnosis  a factor that could have diverted Adderall from people who needed it amid a nationwide shortage that began in 2022. 
The DOJ also claimed that the company continued to operate even after He and Brody became aware that information had been posted on social media instructing people to use Done to gain easy access to stimulants  and that some members had overdosed and died. 
On Tuesday, Kimberly Atwood told Breyer and the court that her brother Michael had died after he was misdiagnosed by a Done provider and relapsed. 
“I have a mistrust of doctors now,” she said. 
KQED’s Azul Dahlstrom-Eckman contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 1.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias1.9%This article: 10.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic10.8%This article: 4.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic4.0%This article: 7.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect20.5%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.0%CalMatters: 3.5%Optimism Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 46.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 8.9%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias46.2%This article: 4.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 5.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error5.2%This article: 1.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias1.9%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect6.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 3.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority3.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope5.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion9.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 7.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal9.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.5%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote5.5%This article: 7.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection7.4%This article: 3.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.7%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…7.7%

770 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers32%attributed speech523writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRoberto Escobar • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Milgram • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Milgram • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageEastern District of New York • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 59 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageKimberly Atwood • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKimberly Atwood • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKQED’s Azul Dahlstrom-Eckman • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anne Milgram

100%flagged-word coverage
61 attributed words25% of attributed speech77% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Quote-first Misdirection+66.0 ptsWriter: 2.9%Anne Milgram: 68.9%68.9%Unattributed Quote+26.7 ptsWriter: 4.4%Anne Milgram: 31.1%31.1%Attempt to Sell a Product -11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Anne Milgram: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-5.0 ptsWriter: 5.0%Anne Milgram: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.