Topic summary
42% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,519 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Fraud results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 1,360 hits . Analysis detected 11,938 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,219 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 25% (11,619 of 15,344 topics). This Healthcare Fraud is better (less manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group. Healthcare Fraud
Topic details
Total words: 13,219
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.3% percentile 2.1% BS Score6 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst