KQED60%

SF Telehealth Executives Could Spend 20 Years Behind Bars for Prescription Fraud 38%

By Katie DeBenedetti69%

7/7/2026, 11:00:51 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 1,132 faulty-reasoning hits from 610 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 44.3% and a BS Rank of 38% (12,710 of 20,372 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the article peer group.

A San Francisco-based telehealth company’s top executives could be sentenced to up to 20 years in prison on Tuesday over a $100 million scheme to fraudulently distribute Adderall and other stimulants. 
In June 2024, Ruthia He, the founder and CEO of Done Global, and David Brody, its clinical president, were convicted of conspiring to commit healthcare fraud and distributing controlled substances to people without a medical need, among other charges. 
He and Brody were also found guilty of conspiring to defraud pharmacies, along with Medicaid, Medicare and commercial insurers, to dispense stimulants in violation of their corresponding responsibility. 
The pair spearheaded the online mental health treatment venture to provide easy access to Adderall, Vyvanse and other stimulants. 
The Department of Justice alleged that they took advantage of eased restrictions on prescribing controlled substances without in-person consultations amid the COVID-19 pandemic. 
“The defendants allegedly preyed on Americans and put profits over patients by exploiting telemedicine rules that facilitated access to medications during the unprecedented COVID-19 public health emergency,” Anne Milgram, then-administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration, said in a statement after their arrests. 
Since the beginning of the pandemic, the company arranged for the prescription of more than 40 million pills, according to court documents. 
“Instead of properly addressing medical needs, the defendants allegedly made millions of dollars by pushing addictive medications,” Milgram said. 
According to the company’s now-defunct website, Brody co-founded Done Global in 2019, calling it a “passion project” to help friends and coworkers in need of mental healthcare navigate a complex system. 
The start-up promoted a quick and easy process to become a monthly subscriber: members completed a one-minute assessment, followed by a telehealth appointment with a licensed clinician before paying the $79 monthly fee for “worry-free refills” and ongoing care. 
In 2022, major pharmacies stopped filling prescriptions from prescribers at Done, and another online mental health company, Cerebral, after reports that some healthcare professionals felt pressured into diagnoses  and amid a federal investigation into Cerebral. 
In 2024, Cerebral agreed to pay more than $3.6 million “for engaging in practices that encouraged the unauthorized distribution of controlled substances” as part of a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. 
Attorney’s Office in the Eastern District of New York. 
Done faced similar scrutiny, and according to court documents, paid medical professionals to diagnose members with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and write them prescriptions for Adderall and other stimulants, even when people did not qualify for the medications. 
He and Brody, among others at the company, created policies including limiting the information available to prescribers, instructing them to issue Adderall and other stimulants even if the Done member did not qualify, and limiting appointments to under 30 minutes. 
The Department of Justice alleged that they falsely represented their prescription policies, claiming that they were able to keep appointments short with a screening process designed to weed out people who were unlikely to qualify for a diagnosis. 
The DOJ also claimed that the company continued to operate even after He and Brody became aware that information had been posted on social media instructing people to use Done to gain easy access to stimulants  and that some members had overdosed and died. 
“Healthcare fraud is not a victimless crime,” said Katrina Berger, the executive associate director of Homeland Security Investigations. 
“It levies a tremendous cost on our nation’s healthcare systems and economy.” 
Milgram said the company’s whopping prescription numbers could have diverted Adderall from people who needed it, amid a nationwide shortage that began in 2022. 
The pair’s sentencing is set for 10 a.m. at San Francisco’s Phillip Burton Federal Courthouse. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 17.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 1.9%Confirmation Bias17.9%This article: 3.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Anchoring Bias3.6%This article: 16.7%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.6%CalMatters: 3.0%Availability Heuristic16.7%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.8%CalMatters: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.6%CalMatters: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 23.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.0%CalMatters: 6.3%Framing Effect23.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.7%CalMatters: 0.7%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 4.1%CalMatters: 3.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.4%Pessimism Bias3.1%This article: 28.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.0%CalMatters: 6.4%Negativity Bias28.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.6%CalMatters: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error6.6%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.1%CalMatters: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias5.1%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.3%CalMatters: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 0.9%Recency Bias7.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 0.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Appeal to Authority10.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.3%CalMatters: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 3.7%CalMatters: 3.6%Hasty Generalization6.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 14.9%Katie DeBenedetti: 9.1%CalMatters: 5.3%Appeal to Emotion14.9%This article: 6.2%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.0%CalMatters: 0.6%Begging the Question6.2%This article: 9.8%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.2%CalMatters: 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.4%CalMatters: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.4%Katie DeBenedetti: 2.5%CalMatters: 3.1%Anecdotal7.4%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.5%CalMatters: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.0%CalMatters: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.1%CalMatters: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 10.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.9%CalMatters: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection10.0%This article: 7.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.8%CalMatters: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice7.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.1%CalMatters: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 1.6%CalMatters: 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Katie DeBenedetti: 0.2%CalMatters: 1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

610 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers38%attributed speech380writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Milgram • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Milgram • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageU.S. Attorney’s Office • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageKatrina Berger • 18 words • 0.0% coverageKatrina Berger • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAnne Milgram • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Anne Milgram

100%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words37% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%37.5%75.0%Quote-first Misdirection+71.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Anne Milgram: 71.8%71.8%Biased Writer Voice-11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Anne Milgram: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.