RedState91%

'You're a Disgrace!' Lawler Unloads on Raskin and Jayapal During Fiery Sanctuary City Hearing 72%

By Sister Toldjah91%

6/30/2026, 11:28:39 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Horn Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 1,282 faulty-reasoning hits from 637 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.4% and a BS Rank of 72% (6,201 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the article peer group.

Without fail, every time Republicans hold congressional hearings on the deadly consequences of the Democrats' sanctuary city policies and Joe Biden's open borders debacle, Democrats make it very clear that they could not care less about the victims. 
And in the instances where they pretend to care, they play whataboutism games while continuing to refuse to take responsibility for dangerous policies that have gotten American citizens killed. 
Jessica Gorman, the mother of murdered 18-year-old Loyola University freshman Sheridan Gorman, is one of many Angel Moms who knows this all too well. 
Nevertheless, she continues to advocate on behalf of her daughter and others who have been senselessly hurt or killed by illegal immigrants in hopes that one day, no family will ever have to go through this again. 
On Tuesday, Mrs. 
Gorman appeared at a House Judiciary Subcommittee on Immigration Integrity, Security, and Enforcement hearing, where the topic was "Sanctuary Policies: Victims’ Perspectives." 
But before she had a chance to speak, the ranking member, Democrat Rep. 
Pramila Jayapal (WA-07), put on a disgusting display, complaining that this was the fourth hearing they'd held on sanctuary cities and suggesting they had other, more pressing matters on which they should be focused. 
And no, I am not exaggerating. 
That's exactly what she did. 
Watch: 
Sheridan Gorman, who was killed in the sanctuary city of Chicago in March, allegedly by 25-year-old Venezuelan illegal Jose Medina, was a constituent of GOP Rep. 
Mike Lawler (NY-17). 
Lawler was at the hearing to introduce Jessica Gorman, but as one might expect, he was incensed over Jayapal's remarks. 
He got even more irate when Jayapal objected to the fact that he was making a statement instead of a simple introduction, which she - and her equally despicable colleague, Democrat Rep. 
Jamie Raskin (MD-08) claimed was against the rules. 
Jayapal's and Raskin's callous indifference to the Angel Families in attendance, combined with the two of them fretting about decorum considering the highly emotional subject matter, caused Lawler to unload on both of them, not backing down one inch in telling the backstory behind Sheridan Gorman's murder despite Raskin's and Jayapal's attempts to shut him up: 
Lawler: "The same outrage you feel about Renee Good and Alex Pretti, you should feel about Sheridan Gorman and Laken Riley, and every angel family." 
Raskin: "I do feel that outrage!" 
Lawler: "You do not! 
Because if you did, you would NOT support sanctuary jurisdictions! 
You should be ashamed of yourself! 
You're a disgrace!" 
Raskin: "You don't belong in this committee, get the hell out of here… You're full of it!" 
Lawler: "You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself for not opposing sanctuary policies that resulted in their daughter's death." 
Later, a clearly angry Lawler went on Fox News to talk about how Democrats had obviously learned nothing from the previous hearings, which is why they needed to continue to have them - if for no other reason than to expose the truth: 
Lawler also pointed out that Republicans are not just talking about this issue, that they're trying to do something about it, but Democrats won't budge: 
And in an interview with TMZ, Lawler point-blank called his colleagues "f**king a**holes" for their disgusting behavior towards Angel Families during the hearing (language warning): 
I should also note that Jessica Gorman did not hold back on Jayapal, either: 
Mrs. 
Gorman's statement, in fact, was one of the most powerful I've ever heard. 
Make sure to watch it below: 
As far as I'm concerned, Raskin and Jayapal gave Republicans a gift headed into the midterms with their pathetic displays. 
It was a pretty powerful reminder that when it comes right down to it, Democrats will put illegal immigrants over the safety and security of American citizens every time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.8%Sister Toldjah: 9.9%RedState: 7.0%Confirmation Bias6.8%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.8%Sister Toldjah: 3.1%RedState: 3.4%Availability Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.8%RedState: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 1.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Sister Toldjah: 8.4%RedState: 9.2%Framing Effect4.1%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.6%RedState: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.4%RedState: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.5%RedState: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.5%Sister Toldjah: 19.6%RedState: 13.9%Negativity Bias13.5%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.1%RedState: 1.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.4%RedState: 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.3%RedState: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%Sister Toldjah: 5.0%RedState: 4.7%In-Group Bias22.9%This article: 4.6%Sister Toldjah: 4.0%RedState: 3.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 2.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 19.2%Sister Toldjah: 1.7%RedState: 0.8%Horn Effect19.2%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.6%RedState: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.9%This article: 33.9%Sister Toldjah: 11.4%RedState: 6.9%Ad Hominem33.9%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 2.2%RedState: 2.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.5%RedState: 3.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 10.0%Sister Toldjah: 2.7%RedState: 2.4%False Dilemma10.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.5%RedState: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.2%RedState: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.3%Sister Toldjah: 9.4%RedState: 10.1%Hasty Generalization16.3%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.8%RedState: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.2%RedState: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.7%Sister Toldjah: 10.4%RedState: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion4.7%This article: 11.3%Sister Toldjah: 2.5%RedState: 1.8%Begging the Question11.3%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.4%RedState: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.9%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 2.3%RedState: 1.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.1%RedState: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 3.8%Sister Toldjah: 1.4%RedState: 2.6%Anecdotal3.8%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.0%RedState: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.2%RedState: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 1.5%RedState: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.8%RedState: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.4%RedState: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 2.2%RedState: 2.4%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.5%Sister Toldjah: 2.9%RedState: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.5%This article: 20.9%Sister Toldjah: 24.7%RedState: 21.5%Biased Writer Voice20.9%This article: 3.9%Sister Toldjah: 5.5%RedState: 4.8%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 0.0%RedState: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 18.2%Sister Toldjah: 21.9%RedState: 15.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias18.2%This article: 0.0%Sister Toldjah: 3.7%RedState: 3.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

637 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech544writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Mike Lawler • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 56 words • 100.0% coverageMike Lawler • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Raskin • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler • 10 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler • 6 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Raskin • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMike Lawler • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 43 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jamie Raskin

74%flagged-word coverage
23 attributed words25% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.4 ptsWriter: 24.4%Jamie Raskin: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -21.3 ptsWriter: 21.3%Jamie Raskin: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Jamie Raskin: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.