Speaker summary
70% 13 analyzed articles/videos 1,201 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamie Raskin results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Hasty Generalization , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.7% saturation with 249.197 hits . Analysis detected 2,534.723 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,201 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.6% and a BS Rank of 4% (27,414 of 28,364 speakers). This Jamie Raskin is better (less manipulative) than 96.70% of the peer group. Jamie Raskin
Speaker details
Total words: 1,201
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.3% percentile 5.6% BS Score13 analyzed videos1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.6% 8.6% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Burden of Proof: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 0.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Red Herring: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Composition/Division: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst