Author summary
69% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,259 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Binder results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.5% saturation with 1,649 hits . Analysis detected 7,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,998 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 62% (2,548 of 6,629 authors). This John Binder is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group. John Binder
Author details
Total words: 5,998
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.6% percentile 3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 11.1% 11.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 27.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst