Breitbart81%

Employees at Migrant Detention Center Say ‘Abolish ICE’ Rioters Have Harassed Them, Damaged Their Property 78%

By John Binder69%

7/22/2026, 2:55:16 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 35% saturation with 180 hits. Analysis detected 1,606 faulty-reasoning hits from 514 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.5% and a BS Rank of 78% (4,875 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.70% of the article peer group.

Employees at Delaney Hall, the Newark, New Jersey, detention center where Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) holds illegal aliens, say they have faced harassment and had their property damaged by “Abolish ICE” rioters who have stationed themselves outside the facility for months. 
In an open letter to the public that ran in the Washington Post, Delaney Hall employees said their jobs have been made immensely more difficult as a result of anti-ICE rioters outside the detention center who have repeatedly attacked law enforcement. 
“We are the men and women who work at Delaney Hall. 
We are nurses, case managers, food service workers, maintenance staff, and security personnel,” the employees wrote. 
“We live in Newark and the surrounding communities, and we come to work each day to do our jobs and to care for the people in our charge. 
We are writing because our perspective has been largely absent from the recent coverage of this facility.” 
They continued: 
“We have been confronted, filmed, and verbally harassed as we arrive for and leave our shifts. 
Protesters have attempted to block vehicles from entering and leaving the facility, and some of us have had our personal vehicles damaged. 
Confrontations outside the gates escalated to the point that local authorities imposed an overnight curfew on the surrounding neighborhood. 
We understand that people hold strong views about immigration policy. 
We are not policymakers. 
We are employees trying to get to work safely, and the danger and intimidation directed at us have made that increasingly difficult. 
[Emphasis added] 
 
Our job is to provide safe, professional, and humane care to the detainees housed at this facility, and we take that responsibility seriously. 
Ensuring the safety and well-being of the detainees and of one another remains our first priority. 
The disruption outside these walls does nothing to advance the safety of anyone inside them. 
[Emphasis added] 
On Wednesday, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee made a number of claims at a hearing on the detention center, suggesting that conditions inside the facility are poor and inhumane to illegal alien detainees. 
“Detainees experience poor ventilation, extreme cold in the winter, scalding showers, physical abuse by guards, and a shortage of basic necessities,” Rep. 
Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said. 
“The medical conditions of detainees are alarming.” 
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials have clapped back at such claims, noting in June that conditions at New Jersey prisons are far more dangerous than the conditions at Delaney Hall. 
DHS officials have said that inmates in New Jersey are two times more likely to die in a state prison than in Delaney Hall and that there are twice as many medical staff members at Delaney Hall as in the state’s prisons. 
From 2018 to 2024, more than 330 inmates have died in New Jersey prisons, including 42 deaths in 2024. 
This indicates that on average, more than 40 inmates die every year in New Jersey prisons, DHS officials said. 
John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News. 
Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 25.9%John Binder: 7.1%Breitbart: 4.5%Confirmation Bias25.9%This article: 11.9%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.6%Anchoring Bias11.9%This article: 8.0%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 3.9%Availability Heuristic8.0%This article: 1.9%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.9%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.8%Breitbart: 3.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 35.0%John Binder: 27.5%Breitbart: 11.9%Framing Effect35.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.5%John Binder: 0.7%Breitbart: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.6%John Binder: 1.0%Breitbart: 3.6%Optimism Bias8.6%This article: 7.2%John Binder: 0.6%Breitbart: 1.7%Pessimism Bias7.2%This article: 30.2%John Binder: 10.4%Breitbart: 9.7%Negativity Bias30.2%This article: 17.9%John Binder: 3.2%Breitbart: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias17.9%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.7%Breitbart: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 4.7%In-Group Bias3.1%This article: 7.2%John Binder: 2.7%Breitbart: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias7.2%This article: 7.6%John Binder: 1.6%Breitbart: 3.1%Halo Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.7%John Binder: 0.8%Breitbart: 1.8%Recency Bias3.7%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 2.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.6%John Binder: 7.9%Breitbart: 4.2%Appeal to Authority27.6%This article: 2.9%John Binder: 1.3%Breitbart: 2.5%False Dilemma2.9%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.0%John Binder: 4.5%Breitbart: 7.9%Hasty Generalization13.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 19.5%John Binder: 7.8%Breitbart: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion19.5%This article: 4.3%John Binder: 1.4%Breitbart: 1.8%Begging the Question4.3%This article: 3.7%John Binder: 1.1%Breitbart: 3.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.7%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 1.9%Breitbart: 1.0%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 30.2%John Binder: 2.6%Breitbart: 2.5%Anecdotal30.2%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.1%John Binder: 2.2%Breitbart: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.1%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.0%Breitbart: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.8%John Binder: 0.1%Breitbart: 0.3%Special Pleading0.8%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 2.0%Breitbart: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.3%John Binder: 0.4%Breitbart: 2.8%Unattributed Quote4.3%This article: 8.0%John Binder: 3.1%Breitbart: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection8.0%This article: 14.6%John Binder: 6.7%Breitbart: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice14.6%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.9%Breitbart: 1.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.5%Breitbart: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 11.1%Breitbart: 7.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%John Binder: 0.2%Breitbart: 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

514 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers28%attributed speech370writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageJamie Raskin (D-MD) • 22 words • 100.0% coverageJamie Raskin (D-MD) • 4 words • 0.0% coverageJamie Raskin (D-MD) • 7 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) officials • 31 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) officials • 42 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) officials • 19 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) officials • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jamie Raskin (D-MD)

88%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words23% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+66.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jamie Raskin (D-MD): 66.7%66.7%Biased Writer Voice-20.3 ptsWriter: 20.3%Jamie Raskin (D-MD): 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Jamie Raskin (D-MD): 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.