Topic summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New-Jersey results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 1,616 hits . Analysis detected 10,902 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,765 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 50% (7,999 of 15,772 topics). This New-Jersey is better (less manipulative) than 50.70% of the peer group. New-Jersey
Topic details
Total words: 8,765
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.3% percentile 3.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst