Gothamist77%

Here's why a Newark flight to Spain had to turn around over the Atlantic 29%

By Catalina Gonella26%

5/31/2026, 10:39:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 1,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 480 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 39.7% and a BS Rank of 29% (14,567 of 20,408 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 71.40% of the article peer group.

A United Airlines flight bound for Spain turned around over the Atlantic Ocean on Saturday night after a suspicious Bluetooth device name triggered a security scare aboard the aircraft, according to passenger accounts and airline officials. 
Flight 236 departed Newark Liberty International Airport around 6 p.m. 
Saturday for what was supposed to be an eight-hour journey to Palma de Mallorca. 
About two hours into the flight, concerns over a Bluetooth device with a suspicious name prompted the aircraft to return to Newark, the Associated Press reported. 
A spokesperson for the Federal Aviation Administration said the flight, carrying 190 passengers and 12 crew members, landed back in New Jersey at 9:37 p.m. 
It took off again and eventually landed in Spain hours later than originally planned. 
Arkansas native Jordan Moore, who was a passenger on the plane, told Gothamist that she spotted the word “BOMB” on her smartphone’s Bluetooth device options after another passenger alerted the airline’s staff of the device name during takeoff. 
Moore said the flight wasn’t immediately stopped, but the captain eventually asked everyone to turn off their Bluetooth devices or the plane would have to turn around. 
Most passengers obliged, until the suspiciously named device was the only one still listed as a network, she said. 
“At first, I wasn't necessarily worried at all. 
I was just like, 'It's a Bluetooth network,'” said Moore, who was on the last leg of a three-flight journey to Spain from Little Rock, Ark., with her friend Hayley Harmon. 
“But then, the captain came overhead and was like, 'This is the final warning,' and they didn't turn it off. 
Every single person has every device off and it still said ‘BOMB.’ 
That is a little concerning.” 
She said dozens of law enforcement officials and emergency vehicles were waiting for the plane once it landed back in Newark. 
“Finally, the doors open and all kinds of cops come on board, like, they're in the front, the back, the middle of the plane, they're just absolutely everywhere and they, one by one, shuffle us off the plane,” she said. 
Moore said passengers were asked to leave their bags on the plane and were made to board shuttle buses back to the New Jersey airport. 
That’s when she noticed the situation had gained traction on Reddit, where another passenger had shared what was happening aboard the plane. 
 We were tired, we were exhausted, at least it was providing us a form of entertainment,” she said. 
Eventually, passengers were allowed to reboard the plane and take off again for Spain, landing there many hours after they had originally planned. 
 We got here around 4 p.m. 
[Sunday], got to our hotel, immediately changed into swimsuits and went straight to a little beach club and had sangria and tapas,” she said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 19.8%Catalina Gonella: 4.0%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic19.8%This article: 6.5%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.5%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 20.8%Catalina Gonella: 3.6%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect20.8%This article: 6.9%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion6.9%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.6%Catalina Gonella: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias10.6%This article: 9.8%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias9.8%This article: 23.5%Catalina Gonella: 5.3%Gothamist: 8.6%Negativity Bias23.5%This article: 5.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias5.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Catalina Gonella: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect5.2%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Catalina Gonella: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 18.1%Catalina Gonella: 2.8%Gothamist: 4.5%Appeal to Authority18.1%This article: 5.6%Catalina Gonella: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma5.6%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%Catalina Gonella: 3.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 4.6%Catalina Gonella: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon4.6%This article: 8.3%Catalina Gonella: 4.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 23.3%Catalina Gonella: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal23.3%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.5%Catalina Gonella: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.5%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 7.9%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote7.9%This article: 1.7%Catalina Gonella: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 21.3%Catalina Gonella: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice21.3%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 3.7%Gothamist: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

480 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers71%attributed speech137writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageFederal Aviation Administration • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 38 words • 100.0% coverageJordan Moore • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 19 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 8 words • 100.0% coverageJordan Moore • 31 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 40 words • 100.0% coverageJordan Moore • 25 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 22 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 7 words • 0.0% coverageJordan Moore • 24 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jordan Moore

90%flagged-word coverage
318 attributed words93% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-32.7 ptsWriter: 45.3%Jordan Moore: 12.6%12.6%Unattributed Quote+11.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jordan Moore: 11.9%11.9%Quote-first Misdirection+2.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jordan Moore: 2.5%2.5%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.