Author summary
26% 20 analyzed articles/videos 9,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Catalina Gonella results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 2,552 hits . Analysis detected 29,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 48,461 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 6% (5,850 of 6,163 authors). This Catalina Gonella is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Catalina Gonella
Author details
Total words: 48,461
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score20 analyzed articles48.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst