Gothamist77%

Safety netting installed on buckling NYC building as crews shore up tower - Gothamist 21%

By Catalina Gonella27%

7/12/2026, 5:50:19 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 16.1% saturation with 84 hits. Analysis detected 674 faulty-reasoning hits from 521 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (17,431 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the article peer group.

Safety netting installed on buckling NYC building as crews shore up tower 
Published Jul 12, 2026 at 8:50 p.m. 
ET 
By submitting your information, you're agreeing to receive communications from New York Public Radio in accordance with our Terms . 
Courtesy NYC Department of Buildings 
We rely on your support to make local news available to all 
Make your contribution now and help Gothamist thrive in 2026. 
Donate today 
Gothamist is funded by sponsors and member donations 
Crews worked through the weekend to shore up the building in Midtown that n early collapsed last week  and added netting to one side of the building to prevent any debris from falling, city officials said Sunday. 
The city Department of Buildings reported that crews worked in shifts around the clock to install new supports at 235 East 42nd Street, where columns buckled on Tuesday beneath newly added floors. 
Workers also put up an exterior netting enclosure on the north side of the tower, which Department of Buildings Commissioner Ahmed Tigani said in a video posted to X added an “extra layer of safety” 
Emergency responders were first called to the skyscraper on Tuesday morning after a 911 call reported bricks falling from the building. 
Concerned crowds gathered in Midtown last week when streets were cleared and offices when a building began to buckle. 
Spencer Platt/Getty Images 
 We've issued multiple orders to stabilize the building, provide continuous monitoring operations throughout, create engineering reports confirming the safety of the building, hiring a third-party engineering consultant and special inspection agencies to oversee the work separate from the existing crew,” said DOB Commissioner Ahmed Tigani. 
Vacate orders are still in effect for nearby buildings, and East 43rd Street remained closed Sunday between Second and Third Avenues. 
Previously known as the Pfizer Building, where the pharmaceutical company was headquartered, the building is now the site of the largest office-to-residential conversion in the country, with 1,600 apartments planned. 
The sagging section of the building is directly below a horizontal expansion being installed from the 23rd to the 32nd floors. 
The building was expected to open to new residential tenants next year. 
The DOB also said it also ordered the developer to hire a third-party engineering consultant to review the work. 
NYC to babysit 500 kids for ‘Parents’ Night Out’ 
Registration for the Aug. 16 event opens at 8 a.m. on Monday, July 13. 
Published Jul 12, 2026 at 2:01 p.m. 
ET 
Trump’s plan to turn NJ warehouse into an ICE detention center is back on 
The Trump administration last month said it would walk away from its plans in Roxbury, NJ. 
But a new court filing says authorities have changed their minds. 
NJ electric bills have been spiking, but $25 worth of relief is on the way 
Brooklyn's busiest bus route may finally get a boost. 
Commuters have waited decades. 
Jersey City mayor’s proposed budget combines contentious 15.5% tax hike with $58M in cuts 
Catch up on the most important headlines with a roundup of essential NYC stories, delivered to your inbox daily. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.9%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Catalina Gonella: 4.0%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 5.8%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.8%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Catalina Gonella: 3.6%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect9.4%This article: 4.8%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion4.8%This article: 4.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.9%Catalina Gonella: 3.3%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias12.9%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.9%Catalina Gonella: 5.3%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias11.9%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.1%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.4%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Catalina Gonella: 1.6%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect6.7%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.1%Catalina Gonella: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias2.1%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 12.5%Catalina Gonella: 2.8%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority12.5%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.7%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.8%Catalina Gonella: 3.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization0.8%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 4.2%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 8.8%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question8.8%This article: 4.0%Catalina Gonella: 2.0%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.9%Catalina Gonella: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.9%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 16.1%Catalina Gonella: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote16.1%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 3.7%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Catalina Gonella: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 13.6%Catalina Gonella: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…13.6%

521 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers30%attributed speech364writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageNew York Public Radio • 20 words • 100.0% coverageNYC Department of Buildings • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageNYC Department of Buildings • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAhmed Tigani • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAhmed Tigani • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageNYC Department of Buildings • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Ahmed Tigani

100%flagged-word coverage
81 attributed words52% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+29.7 ptsWriter: 13.5%Ahmed Tigani: 43.2%43.2%Attempt to Sell a Product -14.0 ptsWriter: 14.0%Ahmed Tigani: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.