Keyword summary
56% 108 analyzed articles/videos 45,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Manhattan results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 21,599 hits . Analysis detected 181,246 faulty-reasoning hits from 222,436 analyzed words across 108 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (31,195 of 34,040 keywords). This Manhattan is better (less manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Manhattan
Keyword details
Total words: 222,436
Article count: 108
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score108 analyzed articles222.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst