Author summary
68% 20 analyzed articles/videos 10,808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Max results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 5,503 hits . Analysis detected 46,571 faulty-reasoning hits from 54,409 analyzed words across 20 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,255 of 6,365 authors). This Samantha Max is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Samantha Max
Author details
Total words: 54,409
Article count: 20
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score20 analyzed articles54.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.2% 6.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst