Author summary
49% 33 analyzed articles/videos 9,963 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Giulia Heyward results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 4,152 hits . Analysis detected 37,856 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,137 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 18% (5,221 of 6,315 authors). This Giulia Heyward is better (less manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group. Giulia Heyward
Author details
Total words: 45,137
Article count: 33
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score33 analyzed articles45.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.0% 7.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst