Author summary
46% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,437 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phil Corso results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 4,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,257 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 40% (3,747 of 6,164 authors). This Phil Corso is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group. Phil Corso
Author details
Total words: 6,257
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.2% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst