Speaker summary
⁠52%4 analyzed articles/videos235.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ahmed Tigani results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 46.2% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 593.864 faulty-reasoning hits from 235.667 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 19% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (18,760 of 26,731 speakers). This Ahmed Tigani is better (less manipulative) than 70.20% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.8% percentile
19.0% BS Score4 analyzed videos235.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 46.2%46.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 20.3%20.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.8%17.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.0%8.0%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 8.0%8.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 46.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 6.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 0.8%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos