Author summary
65%6 analyzed articles/videos3,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Meagan O'Rourke results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.1% saturation with 2,793 hits. Analysis detected 18,754 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,342 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 46% (3,445 of 6,296 authors). This Meagan O'Rourke is better (less manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Meagan O'Rourke
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
46%Meagan O'Rourke (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 16,342
Article count: 6
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510045.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.9%11.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.1%17.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.0%11.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate