Dispatch from COGE: A bureaucratic meeting about cutting bureaucratic bloat 27%

By Meagan O'Rourke66%

7/10/2026, 8:53:12 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 1,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 699 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 38.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,146 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the article peer group.

Six weeks ago, New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani announced the creation of COGE , the Commission on Government Efficiency. 
While the commission's name might sound like Elon Musk's now-dead federal DOGE and conjure up an image of a chainsaw-slashing, afuera -style attack on the city's $125.8 billion budget, the commission has thus far been a typical governmental task force. 
Before proposing changes to the city's charter, COGE is holding a series of 11 meetings to gather input from elected officials and the public about improving government efficiency. 
On Wednesday evening, I went to the penultimate COGE meeting in the auditorium of the historic Riverside Church in Morningside Heights to witness COGE in action. 
The meeting started about 20 minutes late. 
When the commissioners finally took their seats, a lone audience member began clapping, and the rest of the attendees tentatively joined him. 
New Yorkers attended a COGE meeting on Wednesday night in Morningside Heights to discuss improving government efficiency. 
(Meagan O'Rourke/Reason) 
The woman to my right said she was told she may not have time to testify during the meeting because city officials were giving presentations. 
The first hour of the meeting was, in fact, dedicated to lengthy presentations. 
Comptroller Mark Levine urged the commission to adopt clear rules for the city's rainy day fund so emergency funds may be better protected and set aside for times of economic crisis. 
The public advocate , the city's elected watchdog , then spoke about wanting easier access to city agency information. 
New York City Buildings Department Commissioner Ahmed Tigani, fresh off dealing with a building crisis in Midtown, discussed ways to accelerate safe construction projects. 
Tigani's colleague then shared recommendations from the SPEED task force , which seeks to "expedite equitable development" (i.e., build affordable housing faster). 
The Commission on Government Efficiency listened to testimony from elected officials, experts, and the general public. 
(Meagan O'Rourke/Reason) 
After the officials and experts testified for over an hour, members of the public were called to the front of the auditorium in pairs and were given three minutes to share their grievances and suggestions. 
The woman sitting next to me left before testifying. 
The theme of this meeting was streamlining permitting, but participants testified about a range of issues, from street safety complaints to teachers' inability to gather supplies (despite the NYC Education Department's $45 billion budget ). 
Some participants shared testimony over Zoom, and participants were also able to submit written testimony online. 
One gentleman complained that the city was not ticketing cars on his street. 
In line with the COGE mission, nobody at the meeting demanded outright cuts to agencies, but they shared ideas for improving existing processes. 
Like at any public meeting, the attendees at the Riverside Church meeting were a self-selecting group. 
They were not local cranks like in Parks and Rec ; they were mostly leaders of various civic groups and associations, including the Times Square Alliance . 
Those who attended appeared to be in good spirits, clapping after each testimony (although I did catch two people snoozing). 
It was heartening to see that these New Yorkers cared enough about efficiency to attend a three-hour-long governmental meeting on a summer evening. 
Perhaps improving government efficiency in New York City requires a long and tedious process like this. 
But let's remember that several of those at the helm of COGE have had long careers in city—and, in some cases, federal—government. 
These commissioners appear to place great faith in the government's ability to solve problems (if only it were more efficient ), and they have little incentive to cut the programs they have spent their careers building. 
And while COGE may have good intentions, the commission's approach does not attack inefficiency at its source: the expansive size and scope of government. 
Dispatch From COGE: A Bureaucratic Meeting About Cutting Bureaucratic Bloat 
She Came to the U.S. at 4 Months Old. 
She Had To Self-Deport—Because She Came Here Legally. 
Sen. 
Mitch McConnell's Hospitalization Proves Again That Gerontocracy Sucks 
If You Get Drunk and Brandish a Fake Gun in a Waymo, Don't Blame the Cameras 
Why Are Political Independents Less Patriotic Than Ever? 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.4%Meagan O'Rourke: 4.6%Reason.com: 4.6%Confirmation Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.8%Reason.com: 0.6%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 1.3%Meagan O'Rourke: 2.6%Reason.com: 2.4%Availability Heuristic1.3%This article: 4.3%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.7%Reason.com: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.7%Reason.com: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.8%Reason.com: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 11.7%Meagan O'Rourke: 11.9%Reason.com: 6.4%Framing Effect11.7%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.7%Reason.com: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.6%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.5%Reason.com: 0.5%Status Quo Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.3%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.3%Reason.com: 1.1%Optimism Bias3.3%This article: 5.7%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.5%Reason.com: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.7%This article: 34.8%Meagan O'Rourke: 11.0%Reason.com: 8.0%Negativity Bias34.8%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.8%Reason.com: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 3.1%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.9%Reason.com: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error3.1%This article: 5.2%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.1%Reason.com: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias5.2%This article: 3.9%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.0%Reason.com: 1.1%In-Group Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.3%Reason.com: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.3%Reason.com: 0.7%Halo Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.6%Reason.com: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 2.7%Reason.com: 1.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.4%Reason.com: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.4%Reason.com: 1.6%Ad Hominem5.2%This article: 5.7%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.3%Reason.com: 1.1%Straw Man5.7%This article: 3.1%Meagan O'Rourke: 5.8%Reason.com: 3.9%Appeal to Authority3.1%This article: 6.9%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.9%Reason.com: 1.9%False Dilemma6.9%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.4%Reason.com: 1.4%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.4%Reason.com: 0.4%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.6%Meagan O'Rourke: 4.8%Reason.com: 6.5%Hasty Generalization5.6%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.5%Reason.com: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.6%Meagan O'Rourke: 6.8%Reason.com: 4.2%Appeal to Emotion10.6%This article: 4.6%Meagan O'Rourke: 2.1%Reason.com: 1.4%Begging the Question4.6%This article: 1.1%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.0%Reason.com: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)1.1%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.2%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.4%Reason.com: 0.8%Burden of Proof5.2%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.1%Reason.com: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 9.3%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.3%Reason.com: 1.8%Anecdotal9.3%This article: 3.9%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.2%No True Scotsman3.9%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.5%Reason.com: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.0%Reason.com: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.3%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.1%Reason.com: 0.1%Middle Ground2.3%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.1%Reason.com: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.3%Reason.com: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.8%Reason.com: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.6%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.4%Reason.com: 1.9%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 1.1%Meagan O'Rourke: 2.2%Reason.com: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.1%This article: 21.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 17.1%Reason.com: 10.0%Biased Writer Voice21.0%This article: 5.2%Meagan O'Rourke: 3.7%Reason.com: 1.5%Indoctrination5.2%This article: 0.0%Meagan O'Rourke: 1.2%Reason.com: 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Meagan O'Rourke: 2.8%Reason.com: 1.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias3.4%This article: 1.1%Meagan O'Rourke: 0.3%Reason.com: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.1%

699 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers22%attributed speech546writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageCOGE • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMeagan O'Rourke • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMark Levine • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageAhmed Tigani • 24 words • 0.0% coverageSPEED task force • 22 words • 0.0% coverageCommission on Government Efficiency • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMeagan O'Rourke • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Mitch McConnell

100%flagged-word coverage
8 attributed words5.2% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Mitch McConnell: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-26.9 ptsWriter: 26.9%Mitch McConnell: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-6.6 ptsWriter: 6.6%Mitch McConnell: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Mitch McConnell: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -4.4 ptsWriter: 4.4%Mitch McConnell: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Mitch McConnell: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.