Speaker summary
36%36 analyzed articles/videos4,614.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitch McConnell results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 616.269 hits. Analysis detected 3,512.42 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,614.667 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,727 of 25,757 speakers). This Mitch McConnell is better (less manipulative) than 99.90% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score36 analyzed videos4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 1.9%1.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.6%11.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate