Author summary
⁠15%2 analyzed articles/videos3,759 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christopher Roberts results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Confirmation Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 1,197 hits. Analysis detected 8,383 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,162 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (5,444 of 6,244 authors). This Christopher Roberts is better (less manipulative) than 87.20% of the peer group.
Christopher Roberts
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠13%Christopher Roberts (selected)2%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,162
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510012.8% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Author 9.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos