The Blaze79%

Steve Deace: Is Mitch McConnell actually in the hospital, or is it ‘Soviet-level propaganda'? 67%

By BlazeTV Staff87%

7/14/2026, 4:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 22 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Slippery Slope, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 113 hits. Analysis detected 745 faulty-reasoning hits from 330 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 60.8% and a BS Rank of 67% (7,245 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 66.90% of the article peer group.

After a month of silence, Kentucky Republican Sen. 
Mitch McConnell’s office shared a statement alongside a proof of life photograph of McConnell sitting in what appears to be a hospital bed alongside his wife while holding this Sunday’s Washington Post newspaper. 
McConnell shared that he had fallen and had to deal with a “mild case of pneumonia.” 
“My doctors have confirmed that I didn’t break any bones or suffer a concussion,” the statement read. 
“I didn’t have a heart attack or a stroke. 
I don’t have any tumors or hemorrhages. 
But I was briefly unconscious and was taken to the hospital.” 
BlazeTV host Steve Deace isn’t totally buying McConnell’s story, calling the photo “fascinating.” 
“I mean, you typically, when you see people in the hospital admitted for long periods of time, are they typically cord-free or there’s no IVs?” 
he asks, pointing out that McConnell is free of any IVs, cords, and he’s dressed normally. 
“When I look at this, I don’t see anything. 
I don’t see any evidence of an IV. 
I don’t see any machines,” he says. 
“This to me was like Soviet-level propaganda here, right? 
And you make sure to throw the wife in there with all the rumors that she had run off to China or something,” he adds. 
“And his best friend in the Senate was Lindsey Graham,” co-host Todd Erzen chimes in. 
“And he said nothing about Lindsey Graham too, because this came out hours after it was already out that Lindsey Graham had passed away,” executive producer Aaron McIntire adds. 
“To me, the best thing that you can say is that he’s seriously hurt, which is unfortunate again for him and his family. 
He’s seriously hurt, and they staged this in the hospital to make it look like he was due back and didn’t consider any of the details of the kinds of things we’re asking about,” Deace says. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 34.2%BlazeTV Staff: 8.1%Blaze Media: 5.6%Confirmation Bias34.2%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.0%BlazeTV Staff: 5.2%Blaze Media: 3.2%Availability Heuristic10.0%This article: 9.7%BlazeTV Staff: 1.7%Blaze Media: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic9.7%This article: 8.8%BlazeTV Staff: 1.7%Blaze Media: 0.8%Hindsight Bias8.8%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 3.0%Blaze Media: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%BlazeTV Staff: 10.6%Blaze Media: 9.6%Framing Effect7.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.4%Blaze Media: 1.6%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 17.6%BlazeTV Staff: 9.3%Blaze Media: 9.8%Negativity Bias17.6%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.3%Blaze Media: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 4.8%Blaze Media: 2.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.6%Blaze Media: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 6.8%Blaze Media: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.3%Blaze Media: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 1.1%Recency Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.2%Blaze Media: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.5%Blaze Media: 2.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.1%Blaze Media: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%BlazeTV Staff: 3.7%Blaze Media: 3.7%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 4.2%BlazeTV Staff: 2.7%Blaze Media: 2.4%False Dilemma4.2%This article: 13.6%BlazeTV Staff: 1.0%Blaze Media: 1.5%Slippery Slope13.6%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.4%Blaze Media: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.6%BlazeTV Staff: 13.4%Blaze Media: 8.9%Hasty Generalization7.6%This article: 12.1%BlazeTV Staff: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.8%Red Herring12.1%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.8%Blaze Media: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.7%BlazeTV Staff: 12.2%Blaze Media: 8.2%Appeal to Emotion2.7%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.8%Blaze Media: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 8.8%BlazeTV Staff: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 27.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.3%Blaze Media: 1.0%Burden of Proof27.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 1.1%Blaze Media: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 11.5%BlazeTV Staff: 7.4%Blaze Media: 2.6%Anecdotal11.5%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.5%Blaze Media: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.8%BlazeTV Staff: 2.0%Blaze Media: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.8%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.0%Blaze Media: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.1%Blaze Media: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 12.4%BlazeTV Staff: 0.7%Blaze Media: 0.1%Personal Incredulity12.4%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.8%Blaze Media: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 2.9%Blaze Media: 2.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 12.7%BlazeTV Staff: 2.8%Blaze Media: 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection12.7%This article: 2.4%BlazeTV Staff: 11.4%Blaze Media: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice2.4%This article: 3.9%BlazeTV Staff: 7.4%Blaze Media: 4.5%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 0.2%Blaze Media: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 9.2%Blaze Media: 7.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%BlazeTV Staff: 6.6%Blaze Media: 2.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

330 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers98%attributed speech8writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Steve Deace • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageMitch McConnell’s office • 33 words • 100.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMitch McConnell • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 13 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Deace • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 8 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 7 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Deace • 25 words • 0.0% coverageTodd Erzen • 15 words • 0.0% coverageAaron McIntire • 29 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 23 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Deace • 36 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Steve Deace

100%flagged-word coverage
185 attributed words57% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Steve Deace: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+7.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steve Deace: 7.0%7.0%Quote-first Misdirection+4.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Steve Deace: 4.9%4.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.