Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mitch Mcconnell $ results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28.5% saturation with 1,544 hits . Analysis detected 8,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,861 of 37,536 keywords). This Mitch Mcconnell $ is worse (more manipulative) than 71.10% of the peer group. Mitch Mcconnell $
Keyword details
Total words: 5,416
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.1% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 28.5% 28.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst