Author summary
â 96% 1 analyzed article/video 1,132 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kali Holloway results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 30.2% saturation with 1,025 hits . Analysis detected 5,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,396 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of â 82% (1,194 of 6,628 authors). This Kali Holloway is worse (more manipulative) than 82.00% of the peer group. Kali Holloway
Author details
Total words: 3,396
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.0% percentile 4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 30.2% 30.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 7.8% 7.8% Tu Quoque Sitewide 0.2% Author 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 30.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Author 13.0%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 4.6% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Tu Quoque: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst