Author summary
54% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,532 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sasha Rogelberg results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 628 hits . Analysis detected 7,533 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,132 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,110 of 6,350 authors). This Sasha Rogelberg is worse (more manipulative) than 51.00% of the peer group. Sasha Rogelberg
Author details
Total words: 8,132
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.0% percentile 2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.3% 5.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 5.0% 5.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 1.9% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Loss Aversion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst