Author summary
0% 17 analyzed articles/videos 10,718 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Molly Crane-Newman results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 8,218 hits . Analysis detected 47,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 52,836 analyzed words across 17 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,010 of 6,316 authors). This Molly Crane-Newman is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Molly Crane-Newman
Author details
Total words: 52,836
Article count: 17
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score17 analyzed articles52.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 15.6% 15.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst