Author summary
44%3 analyzed articles/videos2,630 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Biesecker results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 1,362 hits. Analysis detected 8,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,164 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 49% (3,223 of 6,207 authors). This Michael Biesecker is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Michael Biesecker
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
49%Michael Biesecker (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 9,164
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.8%7.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.4%4.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 14.9%14.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.4%1.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 14.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos